Aleksandra

It was my first time at this type of the event. I had many thoughts before, but once being there it was really relaxed environment, curious people, okay age mix. Once mixer started time was really flying. Lots of laugh. Nefertiti was good spot for this event.

Maksym

It’d be great to start matching people right away instead of waiting around for two hours. Also, maybe it’d work better to group certain people together from the start — they can figure out later if there’s a romantic vibe or just a friendly one. Cheers 🥂

Gerusa

I think the groups could be reveled a bit earlier so we could help ppl to interact with each other, specially the ones who come alone. Maybe also a short introduction in the beginning and some short announcements, engaging ppl to interact before the "match box" session starts

Rebecka

Great mix of people. Quite shallow questionnaire but a good start. The Matchbox event makes people really talk.

Henry

For the next one, please make better questions. Maybe use MBTI adjacent questions?

Rebecca

I thought it was really uncomfortable with the people working at the event who took pictures without asking for permission. Especially the close ups. They took it while I was talking to other people which made it difficult to speak up about it. I don’t want my face to be on any social media of this event.

Ahmed

I loved this one and definetly find a lot of common stuff with my match

Mihajlo

A lot of friendly people, if you want to meet someone definitely give it a try.

Jakob

Great way to meet some new people. Lots of guys thou and mstches wasnt that accurate

Matilda

It was a fun thing. Don’t think I found the man of my dreams but fun.

Love

Great way to chat with people and meet people

Sofia

Good time, too Quick though :)

Ashwij

Liked the concept and definitely it pulled the crowd. However with uneven number of male and female participants it becomes a waste of time and money for people with friendly match. One idea could be to keep some people on waitlist to balance out the participation. Another idea is to have a double match and set a timer for people to know each other and then they could decide

Alaa

The questionnaire does not include your interests in a person at all. Not an age, weight, height, education, nor anything. It asks some questions about what you would prefere, like 50-50 on first date, or having sex on first date, but not you're looking for in a person or what you actually look like or do. Overall, it sucked. A lot of people were left out since it was simply 'not their type', although your 'science' say it is a 100% match. Definitely fast-dating-shit.

Saga

I will not go to next waste of time i would appreciate if your service could use more concrete and meaningful parameters when creating matches. being paired with someone who was ten years younger than me, financially unstable, and not genuinely interested was not a positive experience. to improve the quality and relevance of matches, i suggest the following: focus more on real compatibility factors such as age, financial stability, interests, and overall life situation. include a clear parameter for family intentions (e.g., wants children / does not want children). avoid overly broad age ranges. instead, use more reasonable age intervals, such as: 20–30 30–40 40–50 50–60 ensure that users are not matched with a large number of people who do not align with their intentions or long-term goals.

Ronja

Carl

Rafal

Adam

Rick

Erik

Linnea

Eduardo

Peter

Victor

Rohit

Francesco

Lisa

Josefine

Roya

Fredrik

Akansha

Joaefine

Aurelia

Zia

Simon

Alexandra

Jesper

Siri

Karin

Ines

Fredrik

Cyncia

Martin

Youssef

Ida

Simone

Frida

Julia

Anna

Wilma

Anis

Bani

Jon

Josue

Luq